This meant that, after ten in the morning, I couldn't do any writing on the computer, I couldn't edit any of my works-in-progress, I couldn't connect with people online, I couldn't work on my blog, I couldn't promote my book or advertise my English classes.
By switching off my computer so early in the day, I successfully cut out 99% of my capability for productivity.
How on earth could this help me become more productive?
Before starting this rather drastic computer-diet, I used to be on my computer all hours of the day. Some days I would be tied down for as much as 7 hours 34 minutes.
How do I know this? I signed up to RescueTime, which logs what programs I use and what websites I visit. RescueTime tells me that about 3 hours of that was spent on email, on reading the news, on social networks and on entertainment. Less than two hours per day (on a good day) was spent on writing.
The PlanSo the plan was that, by cutting off my computer-use at ten in the morning, I would be motivated to get up earlier and do more writing.
The rest of the day, when my productivity dips anyway (RescueTime tells me that I'm 50% productive in the morning, but only 48% productive in the afternoon - with a 50% reduction in time at the computer as well), I would be able to get out into the world.
I would teach, I would go on adventures, I would read and think and cook and perhaps do some writing with pencil and paper. I would, in short, become more human and less virtual.
The ResultsIn the last week, when I was on my CompuTen diet, I averaged less than 2 hours of computer-time per day. Great!
In addition, because my computer-time was squeezed, I became more efficient at doing the important things. Like social networking. I found that I still spent 20 minutes a day on Facebook or Twitter or Google+ (whatever that is).
And I spent significantly less time on the less important things like writing - just 2 minutes 23 seconds last Friday, for example.
Wait. That doesn't sound like the plan. The plan was that I would get up early and write like hell for as long as I could, until the 10am cut-off time.
What actually happened was that I would wake up, somewhere between half seven and eight, and immediately get stuck into email and news-reading, pretty much until my alarm went off at 10am. This isn't the healthiest thing in the world.
So what went wrong?
Well, as it happens: nothing. But as with all experiments, you don't always get the results you're expecting.
I was expecting to get up earlier and be more focussed when I was on the computer. I certainly didn't get up any earlier, but I was more focussed on the computer. I teach English, so I had to make sure that I prepared any worksheets or articles for my lessons first thing in the morning. No more procrastinating.
However, this compression meant that I had no time for computer writing or editing. I found myself mildly frustrated when all this free-from-computer-time brought writing ideas to the surface that I couldn't implement.
So what went right?
It was easy. I had a concrete rule to follow and there was nothing so urgent that it couldn't be achieved without a computer, or couldn't wait until tomorrow.
It was relaxing. There was no rush and panic to check something immediately. If I thought of something I wanted to do, I would write it down on a piece of paper to do the next morning. And then, often, when I got to it the next morning, it wasn't worth doing anyway.
I stopped using the computer for entertainment. Instead of watching the recent Montenegro-England football match online, I listened to it on the radio. This took me way back to my childhood and it was a real treat for my senses and my imagination.
I didn't read so much news and comment online. I did read a lot more fiction and non-fiction offline. I learnt the obvious: offline reading (from a real book!) is deeper and more meaningful. Last week I read the entirety of The Impact Equation and I feel like I absorbed more of it than I would normally (for those interested: it's all right).
I spent more time on my sofa. I spent more time in the kitchen. I spent more time idling. These are all good things in my book.
But, best of all, the CompuTen diet pushed me onto my AlphaSmart Neo 2. This cunning device is perfect for writers. It is nothing more than a keyboard with a tiny display. It does one thing and it does it brilliantly: it writes. Over the course of last week, I wrote more than 5,000 words on the dear little thing (including the kernal of this blog post).
|Neo: The One.|
I consider CompuTen to have been a success. However, it's not a long-term solution. The main problem with it is the forced computer usage in the early morning. I would rather fill this time with meaningful writing (not necessarily on the computer), eating breakfast and showering.
However, CompuTen showed me a number of things:
- I can resist the computer, if I have a concrete rule of when I can use it and when I can't.
- There is nothing so urgent that it can't wait until tomorrow.
- Multi-tasking is a killer.
Multi-tasking is surely the most pernicious capability of computers. My PC can deal with everything I throw at it: a to do list, six documents, a couple of PDFs, a novel in YWriter, iTunes, a couple of browser windows, each with five or more tabs open on news, social networks, Blogger, YouTube...
The problem is that I can't keep up. Humans are programmed to be able to deal with one thing at a time. Multi-tasking is for dweebs.
So my new computer regime (which I am using right now) is to use the PC like a precision instrument.
- I will only use the computer for 25 minutes at a time.
- Before opening the computer I will write down the goal of my activity. One concrete, defined goal, so that at the end of the 25 minutes, I can answer the question: Did I achieve my goal?
- Having just one goal should eliminate multi-tasking, but to make it easier on my will-power, I will only have one program running at a time (when building the links for this blog post, I nearly got distracted by another review of The Impact Equation - but stopped myself just in time!).
- At the end of the 25 minutes, I will close my computer and walk away - no matter whether the goal is achieved or not. I can always set a new goal and work for another 25 minutes, after a short break.
- If the computer task is likely to take less than 25 minutes - DON'T DO IT. I will batch these tasks until I have enough to fill 25 minutes. Email falls into this batch as well.
So that's my experiment over. I do anticipate that my new regime will be harder. I'm going to need rock-hard will power. But I have only 1 minute 22 seconds left of this 25 minute block, so I'm going to press Publish right now!
What are your techniques and tricks for staying on-task at the computer? Please do let me know in the comments - we can get through this if we help each other!